As Scientologists, we know that LRH tech and policy work when applied exactly as written.

LRH put it this way:

"It has been proven continually that orgs
which function on policy deliver and prosper.
Periods of decline have been preceded by
gross omissions,
unwarranted changes
or destructive actions
which obstruct or distract from delivery."

HCO P/L 29 December 1971RB, Flag Representative, Purpose of (OEC Vol 7, p. 1407)

The whole basis for judging any Scientology executive, therefore,
is how closely he or she follows these principles without deviation.

This also tells us whether that executive should be supported or not.

With this in mind, we’ve compared LRH's words and actions to COB's
in roughly 50 key categories of tech and policy.

Here are the results...

Buildings & Fundraising
Physical appearance of buildings
Fundraising
Donations
Super Power

 

Courses
Pro TRs course
Upper Indocs Course
Pro Metering Course
Class VIIIs

Training
Drills
How to train
Speed of training
Product of academy training
Courses vs. internships
Speed of internships
Retreads and retrains
Training/processing ratio

Processing
Floating needles
Rudiments
Overruns
HCO confessionals

The Public
Dissemination
Handling of new people
Handling of field auditors
Ethics
Mandatory auditing/training

KSW
KSW Points 1 to 10
Hidden data lines
LRH references
Unusual solutions

Summary

Leader of Scientology
since LRH's death

* Chairman of the Board, Religious Technology Center (RTC)